Document Type
Article
Publication Date
January 2010
Abstract
This Note examines judicial review and oversight of state educational adequacy remedies in light of education budget cuts proposed during the recent recession. Educational adequacy litigation has been relatively successful in establishing children’s affirmative right to education under state constitutions, but due to separation of powers concerns, most state courts have been quite deferential to legislatures in reviewing remedies for constitutional violations. This leaves many schools underfunded and under-resourced in spite of successful adequacy litigation—a problem that is aggravated during times of recession, when many states face pressure to cut education budgets. This Note examines these issues using functional separation of powers theory, comparative analysis of state and federal government functioning, and pragmatic considerations related to remedial compliance. It argues that state courts should apply heightened judicial review to ensure remedial compliance and particularly to review state education budget cuts that may disrupt educational adequacy remedies. In this way, state courts can be more vigilant in maintaining educational adequacy.
Recommended Citation
Vinay Harpalani,
Note, Maintaining Educational Adequacy in Times of Recession: Judicial Review of State Education Budget Cuts,
85
N.Y.U. L. Rev.
258
(2010).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/276