Abstract
A newly elected liberal federal government in Canada has pledged to reform the legal distinction between charity and politics. This paper provides context to this reform initiative, linking it to a controversial political activities audit program funded by the former conservative federal government. It identifies three distorting ideas about charity—that charity can be understood as a tax expenditure, economic or neutral concept—that should be eschewed in the reform process. It also identifies three characteristics of charity—the capacity of charities for thought leadership, the pervasiveness of messaging in charitable programming and the distinctiveness of charity and government—that should guide reformers.
Recommended Citation
Adam Parachin,
Reforming the Regulation of Political Advocacy by Charities: From Charity under Siege to Charity under Rescue?,
91
Chi.-Kent L. Rev.
1047
(2016).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol91/iss3/9
Included in
Business Organizations Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Nonprofit Organizations Law Commons, Taxation-Transnational Commons, Tax Law Commons
