Abstract
Tom Ginsburg credibly establishes that East Asian legal traditions include elements that can be considered antecedents for perhaps the strongest form of the rule of law, constitutional restraints that apply even to sovereigns. Treating these precedents chiefly as anticipations of Western-style constitutionalism, however, may be historically misleading and may inhibit reflection on the desirability of practices that represent alternatives to Western conceptions of the rule of law.
Recommended Citation
Rogers M. Smith,
Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Considering the Case for Antecedents,
88
Chi.-Kent L. Rev.
35
(2012).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol88/iss1/4
COinS
