Abstract
The note examines one of the issues currently before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. Buono, the case concerning a Latin cross war memorial in the Mojave desert. The issue is whether the government may, by transferring land to private parties, cure Establishment Clause violations caused by permanent displays that contain religious imagery. The article surveys the Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence as it applies to permanent displays, discussing the sometimes-used and sometimes-ignored Lemon-endorsement standard and the potential shift to a coercion standard. It concludes by arguing that even under the Lemon-endorsement standard, courts should often allow the type of remedial transfer at issue in Buono, and it suggests how judges can police such sales in order to ensure that they pass constitutional muster.
Recommended Citation
Paul Forster,
Separating Church and State: Transfers of Government Land as Cures for Establishment Clause Violations,
85
Chi.-Kent L. Rev.
401
(2010).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol85/iss1/20
