Abstract
Focusing on congressional efforts to override state court decisionmaking in the Terri Schiavo case, this essay examines some of the practical problems associated with implementing Larry Kramer's popular constitutionalism. In particular, lawmakers will invoke the "will of the people" when, in fact, they are pursuing special interest politics. More than that, the Schiavo case calls attention to the increasing partisanship within Congress. This partisanship, contrary to the objectives of popular constitutionalism, makes lawmakers less likely to advance the national interest and more likely to focus their energies on their increasingly partisan base. For this very reason, today's Congress is less likely to facilitate Kramer's project than earlier Congresses.
Recommended Citation
Neal Devins,
Tom DeLay: Popular Constitutionalist?,
81
Chi.-Kent L. Rev.
1055
(2006).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol81/iss3/15
