Abstract
This Article offers support for the argument that protective orders for discovery confidentiality should be granted upon a relatively light showing of good cause. Part I offers reasons why, in the vast majority of cases, courts should readily grant motions for protective orders with respect to discovery confidentiality as long as the movant can articulate some legitimate need for the information to be kept confidential. Looking at modern United States discovery from a comparative and historical perspective, broad and powerful party-controlled discovery can only be justified as a means of finding information for the resolution of the dispute, not as a public information tool. Part II explains why some showing of good cause nonetheless should be required, even if the parties themselves agree to the confidentiality protections.
Recommended Citation
Howard M. Erichson,
Court-Ordered Confidentiality in Discovery,
81
Chi.-Kent L. Rev.
357
(2006).
Available at:
https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol81/iss2/5
