Start Date
25-9-2015 2:00 PM
End Date
25-9-2015 2:45 PM
Description
The Patent III panel discussion from the Supreme Court IP Review (SCIPR), September 25, 2015, at Chicago-Kent College of Law focused on the case Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (declining to overrule Brulotte v. Thys Co., which held that "a patentee's use of a royalty agreement that projects beyond the expiration date of the patent is unlawful per se.)
Moderator: David Clough, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Panelists: Thomas Saunders, WilmerHale, counsel for Marvel; David Applegate, Williams Montgomery & John, counsel for IPLAC as amicus curiae in support of neither party; Fiona Schaeffer, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, counsel for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York as amicus curiae in support of neither party.
Runtime: 46:29
Patent III Panel: Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
The Patent III panel discussion from the Supreme Court IP Review (SCIPR), September 25, 2015, at Chicago-Kent College of Law focused on the case Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (declining to overrule Brulotte v. Thys Co., which held that "a patentee's use of a royalty agreement that projects beyond the expiration date of the patent is unlawful per se.)
Moderator: David Clough, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Panelists: Thomas Saunders, WilmerHale, counsel for Marvel; David Applegate, Williams Montgomery & John, counsel for IPLAC as amicus curiae in support of neither party; Fiona Schaeffer, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, counsel for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York as amicus curiae in support of neither party.
Runtime: 46:29